From the BBC - the courts rule against MK Council on setting a minimum distance for wind turbines - but offer some clues about how to approach this issue
See BBC website
Milton Keynes
Council turbine policy quashed at High Court
A Milton Keynes Council policy to increase the
minimum distance from homes that wind turbines can be built has been overturned
at the High Court.
The
council had a limit of 350m in its local plan, but later adopted a sliding
scale of distance requirements according to turbine height.
Judge
John Howell QC did not find the policy unlawful, but quashed it because it
contradicted the earlier limit.
RWE npower
renewables, which brought the challenge, "welcomed" the decision.
In a
supplementary planning document (SPD) last July, the council decided if a
turbine was over 100m high (328ft), the minimum distance from houses must be
1,000m (3,280ft) and even further if the turbine was higher.
The
minimum distance would be 350m (1,148ft) if the turbine was 25m high (82ft).
In
February, RWE npower renewables, which is trying to build two wind farms at Nun
Wood and Orchard Way, brought a judicial review against the council to try and find
the SPD unlawful.
Judge
Howell ruled it was lawful for the council to set separation distances but
decided, because the council already had a policy for minimum distance in its
local plan, the SPD was contradictory and he quashed it.
Council
leader Andrew Geary said it was "rather ironic" the planning document
had been overturned on this point alone.
"Had
we had no policy, we would have won," he said.
"Any
authority that doesn't have a separation distance in policy should sit up and
take notice of today's judgement."
He
added, the council was expected to review its policy further.
RWE
npower renewables said it was pleased the "buffer zone policy" had
been overturned and it would continue to seek to work in partnership with the
council.
Dr Wayne Cranstone said: "We welcome the clarity the court has
brought to this matter, and we believe this will help both the wind industry
and local authorities in determining appropriate policies for the siting of
commercial wind farms."
ANALYSIS
Political Reporter: BBC
Three Counties
The renewable energy industry has welcomed this ruling.
Renewables UK, the body representing the industry, says this could have
wider significance for wind energy companies because there are at least ten
councils around the UK with so-called "buffer zones" in place.
Councils should also take note.
The judge said because Milton Keynes Council's emerging core strategy
had already stipulated a distance, a supplementary planning document would not
have precedence.
Leader Andrew Geary said the message to other councils is "if you
haven't set a distance, then don't bother" - the council would not have
lost if its core plan had avoided mentioning any distance.
No comments:
Post a Comment