Cranfield Parish Council recently gave a strong
“No” to plans to put 135 houses behind Flitt Leys Close on a site that will
also have a school with a future health centre nearby.
It has stated that it is not opposed to
housing (at Central Motors) per se, but to the inadequate access from the High
Street and it believes the proposal is storing up problems by using an existing
road, which is already under pressure.
Parish Council chair Mrs Delise Ball said:
“The housing development itself is on a site agreed by the Parish Council. But
we have never had a proper explanation how a school site was added.
“Flitt Leys already struggles to cope with
traffic. If you add in a twice-daily school run, school buses and health centre
use it promises to be a nightmare.
‘No real effective solution has been found
for our present problems and the additional pressures on an already
overstretched access are short-sighted and frankly ridiculous.”
The council is also objecting because of “adverse
impact” on Flitt Leys Close residents and a lack of progress on a Central Beds
Council pledge to tackle existing traffic congestion in the cul de sac.
It says the proposal inaccurately refers to
Flitt Leys Close providing "adequate access" and it believes a
Central Beds Council aspiration to encourage future residents to walk, cycle
and car share is "highly unlikely".
Other objections include poor information -
The planning documents refer to the health centre being both lapsed and going
ahead - added pressure on parking from the health centre and inadequate parking
per house because of the optimistic assumption that garages will be used for
parking.
The council says there is no evidence how a
school bus will access the school or alternatively drop children off safely
without entering Flitt Leys. And there are concerns about access for fire
service vehicles.
Designated play areas have not been
concentrated as requested and the proposed 'swale' or balancing lake provides
no information for its maintenance or safety.
Planning and highways officials have
repeatedly told Central Beds councillors that the access is adequate, even if a
school and health centre are built.
The Parish Council made a determined
attempt to have the design brief, which gave a school site the green light
overturned earlier this year.
The local development framework (LDF) allocated
housing in Central Bedfordshire long-term. The school site was added in at the
very end of the LDF process after the parish council had supported 135 houses.
Parish Council reps will be meeting senior
Central Beds councillors and planning
officials next week to seek an explanation
how the school was allocated to the site without local discussion.
1 comment:
Flitt Leys - the proposals do not include any mention of capacity issues in Flitt Leys in the 'MOTION' report on access and impact in Cranfield - very noticeable by its exclusion. There is reference to an 'issue' that Highways will address, so the planners do not have the full picture and once passed the Highways solution will become de facto - it is only Cranfield that has to suffer this very cosy outcome between Highways and the developer. Also the school proposal includes a possible/probable second site access, so why is that not included now.
Post a Comment